March 07, 2006

THERMONOMICS® TESTIMONIAL
Smith Aerospace
Grand Rapids, Michigan

Pete,

The numerical correlation between my calculations and yours are exact. Plus also the variation between the two-week baseline (pre-proa inoculation) average daily temperature (69.80 of), the proa inoculation break-in period average daily temperature (70.13 of) and the proa post-inoculation two-week test period average daily temperature (70.87 of) are scant to vanishingly small; working in favor of the proa. That is, the proa was in use during a negligibly warmer period than prior to its introduction into roof top unit #4. No extensive interpolation of temperature variation was needed. The kwh savings are absolutely astonishing at better than 40 percent!

Mr C. Ulmer
Environmental Engineer (PE)